| From: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Static snapshot data |
| Date: | 2003-05-23 18:49:25 |
| Message-ID: | 9hqscvoej3vqqv3fdgvm5i0brq9gm210ch@4ax.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 23 May 2003 13:15:07 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
>[good reasons for having SERIALIZABLE subtransactions in READ
> COMMITTED main transactions]
All I'm saying is if we can have
(1) a simple version with some restrictions for 7.4 and
SERIALIZABLE subtransactions for 7.5 or
(2) nothing for 7.4 and everything for 7.5
I'd rather have (1); as long as we don't cause incompatibilities, of
course.
>We already have START TRANSACTION [...]
Great. I was so used to BEGIN that I didn't even think of trying \h.
:-/
Servus
Manfred
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-23 18:53:24 | Re: Static snapshot data |
| Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-05-23 18:05:06 | Re: vacuum analyze corrupts database |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-23 18:53:24 | Re: Static snapshot data |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-23 17:15:07 | Re: Static snapshot data |