Re: usage for 'with recursive'?

From: "hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Kenneth Downs" <ken(at)secdat(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: usage for 'with recursive'?
Date: 2007-03-02 08:28:02
Message-ID: 9e4684ce0703020028i5def633ct510b7d3f1cb9bbbc@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 3/1/07, Kenneth Downs <ken(at)secdat(dot)com> wrote:
> Better? I think perhaps different. There is materialized path, which
> requires a very problematic unlimited-length column to hold the path,
> and there is upper/lower bounds, which again requires client-side
> row-by-row processing. Both have the unpleasant problem that changes to
> one row may affect many others.

there are also other approaches.
i know that they are not that well known, but there are, and they
allow many things to be done with very simple queries.
i use a solution which basically allows me to query every kind of
tree-structure data without loops or recursion. drawbacks are 2 and
are very limited:
1. it uses some triggers
2. it has some (slight in my opinion) overhead.
i wrote an article about it here
(http://www.depesz.com/various/various-sqltrees-implementation.php).
it's in polish, but has lots of examples so should be easily readable.

depesz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message andyk 2007-03-02 11:46:21 Re: 8.1.8 Installer Fails on Win2k Server
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2007-03-02 07:53:45 Re: Differences in identical queries