Re: PATCH: psql show index with type info

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amos Bird <amosbird(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: psql show index with type info
Date: 2017-03-09 18:34:17
Message-ID: 9a4f2e94-b0b8-55a5-fba6-2188407bdaa2@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/8/17 08:30, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Right, I don't think having an extra column which is going to be NULL a
> large amount of the time is good.

Note that \di already has a column "Table" that is null for something
that is not an index. So I don't think this argument is very strong.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-03-09 18:34:22 Re: Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-09 18:33:27 Re: PATCH: psql show index with type info