Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field

From: "Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ingo(dot)sander(at)nsn(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field
Date: 2010-10-05 07:23:27
Message-ID: 9EB22E4572ECF74AAFEAE743C74D26B203A53EE8@DEMUEXC005.nsn-intra.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

We have done the following test with PostgreSQL 9.0.

create table bytea_demo ( index int, part1 bytea)");

Then we have instantiated a loop (1000) with the following action:

insert into bytea_demo ( index, part1, ) values ('%d', '%s');
", i, entry);

1a) In a first measurement part is supported with a bytea area (entry) of 4000 bytes (4000 characters)
1b) In a second run part is supported with a bytea area (entry) of 5000 bytes (5000 characters).

Result: The runtime of case 1a) is ~ 3 sec, however for case 1b) the runtime is ~ 43 sec. Why here we have such a large difference in runtime.

BR
Ingo Sander

Best Regards/mfG
Ingo Sander
=========================================================
Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH &Co. KG
NWS EP CP SVSS Platform Tech Support DE
St.-Martin-Str. 76
D-81541 München
*Tel.: +49-89-515938390
*ingo(dot)sander(at)nsn(dot)com

Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich
Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRA 88537
WEEE-Reg.-Nr.: DE 52984304

Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin / General Partner: Nokia Siemens Networks Management GmbH
Geschäftsleitung / Board of Directors: Lydia Sommer, Olaf Horsthemke
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats / Chairman of supervisory board: Herbert Merz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich
Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRB 163416

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nimesh Satam 2010-10-05 09:11:49 Error message in wal_log for Streaming replication
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-04 23:36:40 Re: Issue for partitioning with extra check constriants