| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Features list |
| Date: | 2007-08-10 16:08:51 |
| Message-ID: | 9996944D72063B36200569BC@fserv.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, August 10, 2007 08:47:55 -0700 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
wrote:
> JD,
>
>> Well considering the open sourcing of replicator and the fact that we
>> have: Slony, PITR (which is arguably replication) and a host of
>> statement based ones I would agree.
>
> When did you OSS replicator?
Along with that, has someone written a comparison of the various methods?
Like, what does replicator give that Slony doesn't, or vice versa? Having
various solutions provides options, but also creates confusion ... the argument
is going to change from "PostgreSQL doesn't have replication" to "Oh my god,
which on should I use?" >:)
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFGvI2T4QvfyHIvDvMRAj6lAKC0yaxhXGpOFFD/lHM96ClHBrArlwCfbJIz
I7Lcxu5pxbdmowdS0dWxHCI=
=QVN9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-10 16:33:19 | Re: Features list |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-08-10 15:47:55 | Re: Features list |