Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging

From: "Aaron J(dot) Seigo" <aaron(at)gtv(dot)ca>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tim Holloway <mtsinc(at)southeast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging
Date: 1999-10-25 21:50:59
Message-ID: 99102515535807.00882@stilborne
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

hi...

> What about
> SET LOGLEVEL TO <something>;
> SET LOGDETAIL TO <something>;
> or the like. You could use pg_shadow.usesuper as a security stipulation.
> Using something like a signal to do this is probably overkill, especially
> since there are hardly any left, and it's also infinitely less intuitive
> and flexible.

this would be done from psql? if so, here's a query i have: are there any plans
to seperate the admin functions out of psql and into another seperate tool?

i have a queasyness with general users having access to a tool that can
do admin takss (even if they supposedly don't have a superuser account).

it also seems much cleaner to have admin in one tool and data interaction in
another.

am i off track here?

--
Aaron J. Seigo
Sys Admin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Byron Nikolaidis 1999-10-25 23:36:52 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch
Previous Message Mike Mascari 1999-10-25 19:30:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch