| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brook Milligan <brook(at)biology(dot)nmsu(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused] |
| Date: | 1999-09-20 22:50:12 |
| Message-ID: | 99092019003505.00568@lowen.wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I got the final version <24 hours from release. It was in my tree, but
> now it isn't, and it isn't in 6.5.2 either.
>
> I asked for the author to verify my work. I am adding it to the tree
> now. What do we do?
Either make a 6.5.3, inline 6.5.2 (6.5.2a, anyone??) or leave 6.5.2 as is.
None is ideal -- although a 6.5.3 is better than a badly broken 6.5.2. The
short term solution is for those using 6.5.2 to download the pgaccess-0.98
tarball from flex.ro.
I ran across the depopulated pgaccess tree this morning while starting the
build cycle for the 6.5.2 rpms -- good thing I have already dealt with that
issue with previous packages. For the RPM's, it has been practice for some time
to include the very latest pgaccess as a separate tarball, then untarring it
over top of the one in the main tarball during the package build. I was hoping
to get away from that. ;-(
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-09-20 23:03:09 | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused] |
| Previous Message | Yu Cao | 1999-09-20 22:47:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 |