Re: No more <<EOF>>

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No more <<EOF>>
Date: 2000-05-21 17:41:28
Message-ID: 9893.958930888@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On the road to sanitary lex files I finally found a simple answer for the
> non-portable <<EOF>>. Patch attached. Any objections/concerns/comments?

Seems reasonable --- but is it worth worrying about? I had pretty
much concluded that we have no hope of working with non-flex lexers
anyway...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-21 17:44:48 Re: Re: MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-21 17:34:30 Re: plperl and the dynamic loader