Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network
Date: 2010-01-08 08:24:31
Message-ID: 9837222c1001080024u6b119423n4e888c9b790996d9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 05:22, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> wrote:
> David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> On Jan 7, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>> No, I'm suggesting the mechanism needs to support source and binary
>>> distribution. For most *nix users, source will be fine. For Windows
>>> binaries are required.
>>
>> I would love to follow what Strawberry Perl has done to solve this problem. In 2.0.
>
> +1.   They did a nice job.

For those of us who have no idea what Strawberry Perl did (other than
not shipping Microsoft compatible libraries, and is thus useless for
PostgreSQL), could someone explain it?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tomas 2010-01-08 08:49:51 Re: Add .gitignore files to CVS?
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2010-01-08 08:19:05 Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network