Re: cvs chapters in our docs

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cvs chapters in our docs
Date: 2009-12-07 15:49:12
Message-ID: 9837222c0912070749x4ab3c10bjac57ee09f0621f7b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/12/7 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> I would also like to propose that we actually backpatch this. At least
>> the addition of the git documentation and the update of the CVS
>> documentation. So we get this info out there. We don't normally
>> backpatch things like this though, so comments on that?
>
> The sort of people who would actually have a use for the information
> are unlikely to be looking at back branches, so I don't particularly
> see the point.  But if you wanna do the work ...

I'd do 8.4, becuase that's what shows up under /current/ on the website.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2009-12-07 15:52:18 Re: [HACKERS] New PostgreSQL Committers
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-12-07 15:48:31 Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security