| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Eric B(dot) Ridge" <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Client application name |
| Date: | 2009-10-14 16:44:21 |
| Message-ID: | 9837222c0910140944g36a69cf7y6fd8126e2feb6007@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 18:39, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Eric B. Ridge <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Oct 13, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>> A useful feature found in other DBMSs such as MS SQL Server that has
>>> been requested on these lists a few times, is the ability for a client
>>> application to report its name to the server.
>>
>> I've been following this thread closely and haven't seen mention of
>> including the setting as part of the process name, so a 'ps' (on Unix) would
>> display it. Thoughts?
>
> Isn't that cluttered enough already?
+1 for pg_stat_activity but not 'os' output.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-14 16:59:24 | Re: Rejecting weak passwords |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-10-14 16:39:00 | Re: Client application name |