From: | "Justin Hickey" <jhickey(at)impact1(dot)hpcc(dot)nectec(dot)or(dot)th> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | jhickey(at)hpcc(dot)nectec(dot)or(dot)th |
Subject: | Y2K compliant |
Date: | 1998-06-15 16:26:06 |
Message-ID: | 9806151626.ZM28108@impact1.hpcc.nectec.or.th |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello all,
I was recently asked to determine if PostgreSQL was Y2K compliant. Looking at
the questions archive, I found the following:
On April 13, 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart writes:
> For Postgres v6.3 (and earlier) the default date/time style is "traditional
> Postgres". In future releases, the default may become ISO-8601, which
> alleviates date specification ambiguities and Y2K collation problems.
Does this imply that PostgreSQL is not Y2K compliant but will be in a future
release?
BTW please CC any replies since I am not on the mailing list.
Thank you in advance for any information.
--
Sincerely,
Jazzman (a.k.a. Justin Hickey) e-mail: jhickey(at)hpcc(dot)nectec(dot)or(dot)th
High Performance Computing Center
National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (NECTEC)
Bangkok, Thailand
==================================================================
People who think they know everything are very irritating to those
of us who do. ---Anonymous
Jazz and Trek Rule!!!
==================================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1998-06-15 21:53:57 | RE: [GENERAL] cost difference for 2 similar queries |
Previous Message | Monica Rogati | 1998-06-15 14:55:14 | libq++ and security help |