| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | johnnnnnn <john(at)phaedrusdeinus(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
| Date: | 2003-03-13 22:17:33 |
| Message-ID: | 9806.1047593853@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> In both Perl and Python, that type of function is called "join".
> Hmmm -- I doubt that would fly, although I see it is specifically
> allowed as a function name (func_name_keyword list). Anyone have
> opinions on this either way?
Good point --- it would work today, but any small tweak in the JOIN
grammar might force us to reserve the keyword altogether. It'd be
safer to use a name that is not an SQL keyword ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2003-03-13 22:29:47 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-13 22:04:05 | Re: [INTERFACES] Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2003-03-13 22:29:47 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-13 21:03:52 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |