| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | johnnnnnn <john(at)phaedrusdeinus(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
| Date: | 2003-03-13 22:29:47 |
| Message-ID: | 3E71065B.80804@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>Hmmm -- I doubt that would fly, although I see it is specifically
>>allowed as a function name (func_name_keyword list). Anyone have
>>opinions on this either way?
>
> Good point --- it would work today, but any small tweak in the JOIN
> grammar might force us to reserve the keyword altogether. It'd be
> safer to use a name that is not an SQL keyword ...
I'm leaning toward implode() and explode() now anyway because split()
uses a regex for the delimiter in PHP (and probably Perl), and I was not
planning to get that fancy.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-13 22:40:35 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-13 22:17:33 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-03-14 00:06:44 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-13 22:17:33 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |