| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Draft release notes |
| Date: | 2006-09-14 21:11:52 |
| Message-ID: | 9802.1158268312@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> My memory says this was eventually removed, even though it was committed
>> for a time. Am I wrong?
>> - Make EXPLAIN sampling smarter, to avoid excessive sampling delay
>> (Martijn van Oosterhout)
> I see a reversion for EXPLAIN ANALYZE only:
> date: 2006/06/09 19:30:56; author: tgl; state: Exp; lines: +27 -172
> Revert sampling patch for EXPLAIN ANALYZE; it turns out to be too
> unreliable because node timing is much less predictable than the patch
> expects. I kept the API change for InstrStopNode, however.
> so the item is probably still OK.
No, Simon is right, that entry should be removed --- there's nothing
interesting left of the patch :-(
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-09-14 21:14:58 | Re: Mid cycle release? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-09-14 21:02:44 | Re: Opinion wanted on UUID/GUID datatype output formats. |