Re: First feature patch for plperl - draft [PATCH]

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: First feature patch for plperl - draft [PATCH]
Date: 2009-12-04 23:25:56
Message-ID: 97F5E1C9-5161-46D1-BC59-A54A9E614D71@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 4, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:

> Robert's comparison with mod_perl is very apt. Preloading code gives
> dramatic performance gains in production situations where there's a
> significant codebase and connections are frequent.
>
> The docs for plperl.on_perl_init could include a section relating to
> it's use with shared_preload_libraries. That could document any issues
> and caveats you feel are important.

+1

Tom, what's your objection to Shlib load time being user-visible?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-12-04 23:28:35 Re: First feature patch for plperl - draft [PATCH]
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-12-04 23:07:18 Re: New VACUUM FULL