Re: [HACKERS] entries in pg_shadow

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Richards <miker(at)scifair(dot)acadiau(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] entries in pg_shadow
Date: 1999-08-29 01:00:46
Message-ID: 9799.935888446@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

Michael Richards <miker(at)scifair(dot)acadiau(dot)ca> writes:
> The entries entered in pg_shadow haven't ever worked for me. I've tried a
> number of times without success. If I update a user in there and set a
> password for them:

IIRC, the only way to set a password that actually works is ALTER USER.

The reason direct SQL hacking on pg_shadow doesn't work is that
pg_shadow isn't what the postmaster looks at (the PM itself can't do
database operations without getting into possible deadlock situations).
There's a flat text file somewhere that contains the Real Info. ALTER
USER and friends know to rewrite the flat file after updating pg_shadow.

This is documented somewhere, I think, but not nearly prominently
enough...

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Constantin Teodorescu 1999-08-29 07:36:30 Cluster on (index-name) loose NOT NULL properties
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-08-29 00:54:23 Re: [HACKERS] Quoting in stored procedures

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Schallar 1999-08-29 15:43:04 SELECT multiple tables with same fields
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-08-29 00:46:40 Re: [SQL] indexes using datetime