Re: Typos/Questions in bloom documentation

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Typos/Questions in bloom documentation
Date: 2016-06-07 06:01:09
Message-ID: 972541f6-9aa0-bfca-3ea1-4772e6b97374@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/06/07 14:41, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:25 AM, David G. Johnston
> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Amit Langote
>> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> I agree it's unclear. Does the following make it any better (updated
>>> patch attached):
>
> I have sent a patch to rework the docs here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQB8dcFmY1uodmiJOSZdhBFOx-us-uW6rfYrzhpEiBR2g@mail.gmail.com
> This may interest people here.

Thanks, Michael.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2016-06-07 06:06:40 Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116
Previous Message Noah Misch 2016-06-07 05:57:54 Re: Problem with dumping bloom extension