| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message |
| Date: | 2015-11-16 22:10:06 |
| Message-ID: | 967.1447711806@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On 11/15/15 9:50 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> I'd prefer to omit fields if explicitly assigned to NULL. You can always
>> use coalesce if you want the string 'NULL'; I agree with others here
>> that the vast majority of users will want the field just omitted.
> I think the problem was that you can't omit the primary message.
If you ask me, that would be a feature not a bug.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-16 22:30:42 | Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-11-16 21:43:38 | Re: [HACKERS] max_worker_processes on the standby |