Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Tony Marston <tony(at)marston-home(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Date: 2005-10-08 21:30:04
Message-ID: 967.1128807004@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> And you might want to make it a project at http://pgfoundry.org so
> others can make use of it. You might also want to define it as accepting
> an array; I think that would allow you to accept any number of
> parameters.

I think Tony is trying to avoid putting in any actual work ;-). To me,
the sanest change would be to modify his app to use the SQL-standard
syntax. Which surely is supported by those other databases too, no?
And if not, why are *we* the ones getting the bug report?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Marston 2005-10-08 22:11:58 Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-08 21:25:49 Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function