| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux | 
| Date: | 2009-12-01 15:12:46 | 
| Message-ID: | 964.1259680366@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Is there a reasonably cheap way to check whether the backend has a
> WAL file open and whether that one is the current append target?
Detecting whether we have a WAL file open is trivial (just look at
the static variable holding the file descriptor).  Determining whether
it's still the current append target is not so cheap though; it would
require examining shared-memory status which means taking a lock on
that status (and it's a high-traffic lock already).
We could have the open WAL file dropped if stale as a side-effect
anytime we have occasion to examine that shared state anyway.  But
in a nearly-read-only session such as your example I'm not sure that
would happen often enough to fix the problem.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-01 15:15:36 | Re: Block-level CRC checks | 
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-01 15:09:49 | Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 |