| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability attributes |
| Date: | 2002-04-03 16:12:09 |
| Message-ID: | 9607.1017850329@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
> (1) const or constant
> (2) cacheable
> (3) volatile
I was wondering about "const" for case 1, also. I think there is some
precedent for using "const" with this meaning in other programming
languages. "volatile" for case 3 seems reasonable.
> Tom: My mail doesn't reach you. As an AT&T user, you block my machine's IP
> address with the anti-spam blocking. :-(
Sorry about that. I like 510sg's dnsbl list precisely because it's
aggressive, but sometimes it's too aggressive. I can whitelist you
if you have a stable IP address ... is 24.147.138.78 a permanently
assigned address, or not?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Scherbaum | 2002-04-03 16:16:54 | Re: Escaping in C-language functions |
| Previous Message | mlw | 2002-04-03 16:11:28 | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2002-04-03 16:17:35 | Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) |
| Previous Message | mlw | 2002-04-03 16:11:28 | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability |