Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Date: 2010-11-23 16:04:29
Message-ID: 9534.1290528269@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, anoncvs.postgresql.org still doesn't resolve for me. Shouldn't
>> that DNS update have propagated by now?

> Fixed ...

OK, now it resolves, but it doesn't respond on port 80.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-11-23 16:48:36 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-11-23 15:56:53 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?