Re: 7.4 changes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4 changes
Date: 2004-10-17 17:52:52
Message-ID: 9402.1098035572@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Do we want to backport tighter security for plperl? In particular,
> insisting on Safe.pm >= 2.09 and removing the :base_io set of ops?

I'd vote not: 7.4.5 => 7.4.6 is not an update that people would expect
to break their plperl code ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-17 18:13:48 Re: spinlocks: generalizing "non-locking test"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-17 17:50:46 Re: additional GCC warnings