Re: libpq naming on Win64

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq naming on Win64
Date: 2010-01-07 10:15:01
Message-ID: 937d27e11001070215t4ce71fa7rb724371658cfb630@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing the point and have a question.
>
> For example, do 32bit psql and the 64bit one have the same name?
> If so, where will they be installed?

I'm only talking about libpq. I see no reason to have 32 & 64 bit
versions of other utilities installed in parallel.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-01-07 10:26:13 Re: Bug with PATHs having non-ASCII characters
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2010-01-07 10:10:52 Re: unresolved bugs