| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Eric B(dot) Ridge" <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Client application name |
| Date: | 2009-10-21 09:19:30 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10910210219m348e2a51w90d0cd06183e19c1@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> ISTM much of the complexity discussed relates to this second feature.
> Let's just concentrate on getting the connection-pool-identification
> aspect of this done right and then maybe add second part later.
That side of the patch works fine already (it's only a GUC after all),
as does the during-connection option. The current problem is that old
servers will barf if it's set in the startup packet.
And yes, the stats part also works :-).
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-10-21 09:40:09 | Re: Client application name |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-10-21 09:14:35 | Re: Client application name |