Re: [BUGS] Integrity check

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: "Prasad, Venkat" <venkat(dot)prasad(at)credit-suisse(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Integrity check
Date: 2009-06-23 13:30:50
Message-ID: 937d27e10906230630o5fbea56braaa674015e6241f2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-general

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, David Fetter<david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:

>> Auditors can be a funny breed.
>
> They can, at that, but in this case, they're simply doing the normal
> human thing of trying to figure out whether there's a way they can
> push off their work to someone or something else.  In this case, they
> can't.

Depends what they've been hired to audit exactly - there's a
difference in the way they will attack the IT aspects of a financial
audit versus an IT management audit for example. In my experience, the
former is worse because they are often done by finance people who will
simply box-tick 'verified backups' before reporting to the board or
regulator, unlike an IT auditor who will look at the systems as a
whole and judge the processes based on their technical merit.

Anyway - this is pre-beer conference talk...

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lars Kanis 2009-06-23 13:47:48 Re: BUG #4869: No proper initialization of OpenSSL-Engine in libpq
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-06-23 13:26:56 Re: [BUGS] Integrity check

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message DaNieL..! 2009-06-23 13:42:21 Re: Please suggest me on my table design (indexes!)
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-06-23 13:26:56 Re: [BUGS] Integrity check