Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "Liraz Siri" <liraz(at)turnkeylinux(dot)org>, "Chander Ganesan" <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]
Date: 2008-12-10 16:36:59
Message-ID: 937d27e10812100836j6d2625c9k3dae2bc3874063b1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Robert Treat
<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:

> Hmm... wasn't aware we discriminated against proprietary packagers. I'd think
> companies like truviso and greenplum (and edb if they had different people in
> charge) would all be interested in rolling out security updates asap,

What's that supposed to mean? We bust a gut to get the PostgreSQL and
Postgres Plus standard server updates released on release day, and
Advanced Server usually follows within a week or so (due to the
additional QA requirements).

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-12-10 16:57:55 Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]
Previous Message Robert Treat 2008-12-10 15:59:04 Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]