Re: wiki.postgresql.org is awfully slow this evening

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: wiki.postgresql.org is awfully slow this evening
Date: 2008-09-04 14:38:16
Message-ID: 937d27e10809040738k75b5c73do540df55bc5f366e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> No we haven't - not even remotely. At a rough count we'd need at least
>> another 17 servers (based on the current number of VMs), and we'd lose
>> the ability to move services between hardware quickly and easily. Oh,
>> and we'd have the management headache of dealing with a bunch more
>> hosting providers, as I doubt the current ones will give us that many
>> boxes.
>
> *cough*
>
> Yes I think they would.

Ya think? I'm struggling to see which of our 6 providers would pony up
more than a couple more machines.

> That being said :) I think its a mistake. It would be a complete waste of
> resources to go to dedicated machines. Some of the machines we have we
> hardly use at this point.

I think most are certainly used, but some require much fewer resources
than others.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-09-04 15:01:39 Re: wiki.postgresql.org is awfully slow this evening
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-09-04 14:32:39 Re: wiki.postgresql.org is awfully slow this evening