Re: Explain XML patch v2

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Raney" <raneyt(at)cecs(dot)pdx(dot)edu>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Explain XML patch v2
Date: 2008-07-04 18:38:13
Message-ID: 937d27e10807041138u3b69dd27ra9d725d231f0c400@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> * If the patch was implemented as an ExplainOneQuery_hook we would be
> able to use this with 8.3 also, which might be interesting. So there's
> no real need for this to be a patch on core.

Would that mean that instead of being an optional format that pgAdmin
could request with appropriate grammar, it would be something that was
only available if the plugin was loaded, and would replace regular
EXPLAIN output? If so, that would be extremely inconvenient, and next
to useless for general purpose utilities.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-07-04 18:56:01 Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in win32 shmem name generation: * Don't cut
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-07-04 17:50:18 Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-07-04 19:32:06 Re: Relation forks & FSM rewrite patches
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-07-04 16:36:43 Re: Relation forks & FSM rewrite patches