| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CommitFest rules |
| Date: | 2008-07-03 19:45:29 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10807031245t9bcebc4i54fc36e0000fbc31@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The one I advised be added (the Auto Explain patch) was posted on Mar
> 29, 2008 (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg01214.php),
> re-posted the Jun 30th and then an updated patch today... It only
> being the 3rd i figured it still meet the criteria. If thats not the
> case, I apologize.
You'll note I didn't actually mention any specific patches.
The CommitFests are designed to be short and quick to complete. We
need *all* patches to be listed (not just posted to a list sometime in
the past couple of months) before it starts, otherwise organisation of
reviewers and completion of the Fest becomes chaotic for all and a
nightmare task for the CommitFest manager.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Hammond | 2008-07-03 20:42:30 | Re: the un-vacuumable table |
| Previous Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2008-07-03 19:34:34 | Re: CommitFest rules |