Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:39:34 -0300
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > +1 to the project -- assuming that it means a change of infrastructure
> > and not necessarily of tools. I, for one, would oppose changing Mj2
> > for Mailman, for instance. (However, whether we use Sendmail or
> > Postfix or something else entirely I don't care ...)
>
> Actually this is a good point. We really should define requirements as
> part of this, let's not just do it wholesale. Here are a couple:
>
> * Software must be open source?
> * Environment must be managed by the community
> * Attempt to have admins in each of the following timezones
> EST
> PST
> CET
> * I believe with those three we have 24x7 coverage
> * FreeBSD is OS?

Please stick to the point of this thread.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk