Re: Obsolete "FORCE" option for REINDEX

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Erwin Brandstetter" <brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Obsolete "FORCE" option for REINDEX
Date: 2008-02-20 15:21:29
Message-ID: 937d27e10802200721q5b076725sf79bdd738d830c2e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Erwin Brandstetter
<brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at> wrote:
> dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Erwin Brandstetter
> > <brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at> wrote:
> >> dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Erwin Brandstetter
> >> > <brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> > FORCE
> >> >> > This is an obsolete option; it is ignored if specified.
> >> >
> >> > Hi Erwin,
> >> >
> >> > Thats a candidate for removal in the next release (anyone wanna pickup
> >> > that little task?), but 1.8.x is advertised as supporting 7.3...
> >>
> >> Right. But didn't we also have this feature that displays options for pg
> >> version >= x or <= x?
> >> In this case <= 7.3.
> >
> > Err, no? I'm not entirely sure what you mean though.
>
>
> Like we show comments on roles for pg version >= 8.2 - as this feature does
> not exist in earlier versions.
>

Right, but thats a data thing essentially. We don't try to adjust the
UI around new or removed features, except to disable controls where
they shouldn't be used because they will break things.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Oracle-compatible database company

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robins Tharakan 2008-02-21 03:53:49 Re: Obsolete "FORCE" option for REINDEX
Previous Message Erwin Brandstetter 2008-02-20 15:13:20 Re: Obsolete "FORCE" option for REINDEX