Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Date: 2008-02-06 16:13:49
Message-ID: 937d27e10802060813o6934561jc0a1d3e428d9ad81@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 6, 2008 3:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> I would like to see this tied down some more. The time for the commit
> fests is too open ended. I think we should say something like "All
> commit fests will run no more than two weeks, except for the final
> commit fest which can run for one month."

I think thats one of the problems - without knowing what patches are
going to come in, or how many there will be, we have no way of knowing
how long each fest will take. What this does mean though is that we
continuously feedback to developers and keep the patch queue down -
kinda like checkpoint smoothing I guess.

/D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2008-02-06 16:21:09 Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-02-06 16:12:58 Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan