Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> After chatting with Magnus, we feel that a good solution would be to
> rename libpq on Win64 to libpq64.dll to distinguish it from the 32 bit
> equivalent.
Isn't that going to break applications? Where by "break" I mean
"have to explicitly link with 'libpq64', thereby rendering them
unportable to any other platform".
I would have thought Microsoft would have a better solution than this
for managing 64-bit libraries. Or am I too optimistic about Redmond's
competence?
regards, tom lane