Re: Bug in 9.0Alpha4

From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in 9.0Alpha4
Date: 2010-03-16 16:13:24
Message-ID: 9362e74e1003160913w2a3b0c4co163aa2a0435076bc@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> transformSortClause is passed the untransformed aggorder list, which is
> in fact a list of SortBy nodes, and it returns the transformed list
> (SortGroupClause nodes), which is stored back into the aggorder field
> a bit further down.
>
> There are a number of regression tests that would fail in obvious ways
> if this code didn't work.
>
> Right Tom. I got confused, because the comment at Aggref struct definition
told that it is a list of SortGroupClause. May be you can update your
comments there.

Thanks,
Gokul.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-03-16 19:23:48 parametrized NOTIFY - issue in plpgsql, maybe ToDo
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-03-16 16:04:48 Re: Bug in 9.0Alpha4