Re: Some ideas about Vacuum

From: "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Markus Schiltknecht" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers list" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some ideas about Vacuum
Date: 2008-01-09 14:49:38
Message-ID: 9362e74e0801090649j37f56e3cg1a153738925c280@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> So it's easily possible having more dead tuples, than live ones. In such
> cases, scanning the WAL can easily takes *longer* than scanning the
> table, because the amount of WAL to read would be bigger.

Yes... i made a wrong assumption there...... so the idea is totally
useless.

Thanks,
Gokul.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-01-09 14:49:49 Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-01-09 14:47:48 Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps