| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tamsin" <tg_mail(at)bryncadfan(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Rules & sequences |
| Date: | 2000-07-31 14:38:47 |
| Message-ID: | 9361.965054327@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Tamsin" <tg_mail(at)bryncadfan(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I'm having a problem with my insert rule -
> create rule address_ins as on insert to address DO
> insert into address_hist values (new.*,current_timestamp,'insert');
> The problem is, my address table has default nextval('address_id_seq') as
> the default for the Primary key. When I insert into the address table, the
> rule seems to take the nextval of the sequence for the audit table, and then
> the actual insert into the address table takes another nextval,
I think this may be an inherent problem in the way rules are handled
(unless Jan has an idea how to fix it). You'd probably have better luck
using a trigger.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | g | 2000-07-31 14:42:34 | Re: select question |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-31 14:33:08 | Re: gcc-version |