Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Date: 2015-03-17 17:03:03
Message-ID: 9323.1426611783@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I think one valid criticism is that Tom should transition his
> commitments to this new-normal, especially for the the Grouping Set
> patch, rather than allowing things to dangle in an unknown state.

Well, as far as that goes, I had every intention of getting to the
GROUPING SETS patch before the end of the final commitfest, and I still
will if nobody else picks it up soon.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-17 17:04:49 Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-03-17 16:51:55 Re: ranlib bleating about dirmod.o being empty