Re: pgtcl large object fix

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mahlon Stacy <mcs(at)mayo(dot)edu>
Cc: "'pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgtcl large object fix
Date: 2003-08-06 22:02:52
Message-ID: 9293.1060207372@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Mahlon Stacy <mcs(at)mayo(dot)edu> writes:
> Newer versions of TCL implement ByteArray objects which are
> the best fit for Postgresql Large Object functions.

How newer is "newer"? That is, what compatibility problems might we
create if we make this change?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian van der Leeden 2003-08-07 06:51:17 range query with timestamp returns different result with index than without (7.3.3)
Previous Message Mahlon Stacy 2003-08-06 18:31:15 pgtcl large object fix