| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jamie Koceniak <jkoceniak(at)mediamath(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #12050: Orphaned base files |
| Date: | 2015-03-06 18:34:09 |
| Message-ID: | 929.1425666849@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Jamie Koceniak <jkoceniak(at)mediamath(dot)com> writes:
> If I don't remove the orphaned files, is there any change that Postgres could use the same file node (oid) again?
> For example, say file node 2602351127 doesn't exist anywhere in pg_class, could Postgres use that same file node id again?
> What would happen in that case?
It will not overwrite an existing file when selecting a new relfilenode.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bryce Nesbitt | 2015-03-06 18:46:57 | Re: BUG #12834: Avoiding Disk Control Writes for better Laptop / SSD compatibility. pgstats |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-03-06 18:33:58 | Re: BUG #12834: Avoiding Disk Control Writes for better Laptop / SSD compatibility. pgstats |