Re: OS/400 support?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OS/400 support?
Date: 2003-01-07 03:00:23
Message-ID: 9224.1041908423@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com writes:
> It was based on the CMU "Hydra" project,

Really!? Small world ... I was part of the Hydra team, more years ago
than I like to admit in public.

> Somehow, I'm not sure that PostgreSQL-on-OS/400 is likely to be more
> than a curiosity.

Probably. But a lot of our ports are just curiosities, at least to them
as aren't running that particular OS. My feeling is that Postgres on
top of PASE might be reasonable to support; I doubt we'd want to mess
with a native port.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2003-01-07 03:08:56 Re: I feel the need for speed. What am I doing wrong?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-07 02:51:14 Re: OS/400 support?