Re: 8.2 features status

From: AgentM <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-08 22:09:20
Message-ID: 916D3682-6522-4AEA-887C-C6EA3D48D769@themactionfaction.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Aug 8, 2006, at 17:47 , Josh Berkus wrote:

>
> What happens now is:
>
> A starts working on X.
> 3 months pass
> B comes to hackers, spends hours reading the archives, doesn't find
> X (because they know it by a different name), comes to -hackers and
> asks "Is anyone working on X?"
> B waits for 2 weeks without an answer and repeats the question.
> Hackers E, F and G reply "yes, someone is but I don't remember who,
> search the archives for keyword X"
> B searches again, finds original post.
> B e-mails A and gets no response.
> B finally offers to take over X
> Hackers M, L, and N say "sure, but read the archives for spec info"
> B reads more archives for several hours.
>
> There's a LOT of unnecessary overhead in that process: having a
> simple web app that lists who claimed what todo and when, any
> status updates if they've voluntarily provided them, and links to
> archive discussions, we could reduce the above to a 3-step process
> making it vastly easier for new hackers to get started.

A developers' wiki with links into the list archives would be great.

-M

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-08 22:30:09 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-08-08 21:55:47 Re: proposal for 8.3: Simultaneous assignment for PL/pgSQL