Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> The correct lingo would be standard_conforming_strings. I'm going to change
>> that.
> Sounds good.
No problem here either.
> Another question is whether this should be backpatched to
> our next 7.4.X or 8.0.X release as read-only variables.
Unnecessary; any client code written to use this need only assume that
absence of the parameter means the old behavior.
regards, tom lane