From: | "Trevor Talbot" <quension(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit |
Date: | 2007-10-22 20:19:24 |
Message-ID: | 90bce5730710221319n616bcac0rf53f38931fa7985f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 10/22/07, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Trevor Talbot wrote:
> > I'd probably take the approach of combining win32_waitpid() and
> > threads. You'd end up with 1 thread per 64 backends; when something
> > interesting happens the thread could push the info onto a queue, which
> > the new win32_waitpid() would check. Use APCs to add new backends to
> > threads with free slots.
>
> I was planning to make it even easier and let Windows do the job for us,
> just using RegisterWaitForSingleObject(). Does the same - one thread per
> 64 backends, but we don't have to deal with the queueing ourselves.
Oh, good call -- I keep forgetting the native thread pool exists.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-10-22 20:23:14 | Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-10-22 20:19:16 | Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-10-22 20:23:14 | Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-10-22 20:19:16 | Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit |