Re:

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2002-09-12 19:07:29
Message-ID: 9008.1031857649@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I would love to say that this is related to change in casts, but that
> isn't the case. It is the new double-precision handling of dates;

You've got that exactly backwards: date_part has always returned double.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: at 2002-09-12 16:15:16 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

  • Re: at 2002-09-16 01:03:58 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-12 19:12:09 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Previous Message Luciano Gerber 2002-09-12 18:33:13 fixpoint