| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |
| Date: | 1999-05-31 15:22:50 |
| Message-ID: | 9001.928164170@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> writes:
>> I suspect that huge INIT_TABLE_SIZE prevented dynamic expanding the
>> hash tables and seems there's something wrong in the routines
>> responsible for that.
> Seems like that -:(
OK, as the last guy to touch dynahash.c I suppose this is my
bailiwick... I will look into it today.
> If we'll not fix expand hash code before 6.5 release then
> I would recommend to don't use INIT_TABLE_SIZE in
If we can't figure out what's really wrong then that might be
a good kluge solution to get 6.5 out the door. But I'd rather
try to fix it right first.
Can anyone send me a test case script that reproduces the problem?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cary O'Brien | 1999-05-31 15:45:07 | Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Horak Daniel | 1999-05-31 15:18:55 | RE: [HACKERS] report for Win32 port |