| From: | Affan Salman <affans(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Darren Alcorn <dalcorn(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, luss(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables |
| Date: | 2005-07-13 16:30:38 |
| Message-ID: | 8dfd3d16050713093011c9692@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/7/05, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> > It would need to be a fairly strong one, given that they basically
> > violate the relational model. If what you're really interested in
> > is XML data support, then I'd suggest focusing on that instead.
>
> XML data support would be best if coordinated. There are several
> different projects right now, and one more would be bad.
>
David,
Can you enumerate or refer to these *apparently*
uncoordianted/disparate XML data support projects? I would also
appreciate any progress/status information on 'em, if possible.
Thanks,
Affan Bin Salman,
Lead Database Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation.
mailto: affan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
blog: http://affans.blogspot.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-07-13 17:03:44 | Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default |
| Previous Message | Affan Salman | 2005-07-13 16:24:12 | Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables |