Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-01-21 16:39:14
Message-ID: 8dafbecd42d5ad1d40c958fb838fcb71@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

>> Better yet, how about we bite the bullet and make the name change
>> official. Seems like a major version bump is the right time
>> to do it.

> I thought we ended up that thread already?

Well, the thread may have ended, but the problem remains. Call
it the 900 pound gorilla in a room full of elephants. I know
many people are loathe to see the discussion come up again,
but as long as the project is saddled with its ugly and
unweildy official name, it has a large problem.

It's really in the best interests of the project to make the
change as soon as possible, and undo the mistake of changing
it from Postgres in the first place. Changing it to coincide
with the interest bounce we'll get from the Oracle/MySQL
situation seems a no-brainer from an advocacy perspective.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001211135
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktYgw0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjgSwCghMphV61CIRDBGGscItZxvVQ9
E54AnjGqqYuXewjmwszaXX0sP7oWlg68
=DQfT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-01-21 16:54:03 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2010-01-21 15:29:15 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-01-21 16:54:03 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-21 16:29:17 Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS