Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?

From: Mike <1100100(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?
Date: 2006-04-09 12:27:47
Message-ID: 8ca422820604090527v213a9b86mc37c9b03f3e27cc2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Mr. Momjian,
Congratulations on the new position at EnterpriseDB.

On 4/8/06, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> ebcorder(at)rockwellcollins(dot)com wrote:
> >
> > Hi All
> >
> > I started using PostgreSQL\Postgis in January. Lately I have been
> > reading on the internet many rumblings about PostgreSQL being slower
> than
> > MySQL/SQLLite etc etc. Comparisons made were routine inserts , updates,
> > and deletes. Is any of this true? If so,are there methods to speed
> > things up? I used the Explain Analyze command on portgesSQL it seemed
> > fast although I have not run any other DB's.
> > I know when comparison tests are performed they can be tilted on these
> > internet sites. But I see so many people declaring PostgreSQL to be the
> > slowest I am thinking where there is smoke there's fire.
>
> Lots of people still think Elvis is alive. :-)
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sid Murthy 2006-04-09 13:51:55 Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?
Previous Message James Long 2006-04-09 06:27:07 Re: How to append records into a file which has serial